Semiotic Strategies of Authenticity and Sustainability in Indonesian Tourism Marketing
Abstract
This study investigates how sign systems in heritage tourism marketing construct and communicate the intertwined concepts of authenticity and sustainability. By integrating Saussurean and Peircean semiotic frameworks, it develops a dual-layered analytical approach to decode both the structural composition of signs and the interpretive processes through which meaning is produced. Focusing on promotional materials from the Borobudur Temple, Sindutan Artwork at Yogyakarta International Airport, and the Dieng Plateau Culture Festival, this research shows how iconic, indexical, and symbolic signs generate multilayered meanings that shape visitors’ perceptions of heritage. Iconic signs evoke visual authenticity through resemblance; indexical signs anchor heritage in credibility and continuity; and symbolic signs articulate sustainability as the enduring transmission of cultural values. Beyond descriptive analysis, the study argues that sustainability in heritage tourism operates as a semiotic process—semiosis—in which meaning itself becomes a vehicle for cultural preservation and adaptation. This theoretical reframing advances semiotic studies by positioning authenticity and sustainability not merely as managerial outcomes but as evolving sign systems. Practically, the findings guide heritage marketers and policymakers in designing communication strategies that maintain cultural integrity while remaining resonant with contemporary audiences.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini menyelidiki bagaimana sistem tanda dalam pemasaran pariwisata warisan budaya mengonstruksi dan mengomunikasikan konsep autentisitas serta keberlanjutan yang saling terkait. Dengan mengintegrasikan kerangka kerja semiotika Saussurean dan Peircean, penelitian ini mengembangkan pendekatan analisis berlapis ganda untuk membedah komposisi struktural tanda serta proses interpretatif dalam memproduksi makna. Berfokus pada materi promosi Candi Borobudur, seni ilustrasi Candi Sindutan di Bandara Internasional Yogyakarta, dan Festival Budaya Dataran Tinggi Dieng, penelitian ini menunjukkan bagaimana tanda-tanda ikonik, indeksikal, dan simbolik menghasilkan makna berlapis yang membentuk persepsi pengunjung terhadap warisan budaya. Tanda ikonik membangkitkan otentisitas visual melalui kemiripan, tanda indeksikal menambatkan warisan budaya pada kredibilitas dan kontinuitas, dan tanda simbolik mengartikulasikan keberlanjutan sebagai transmisi nilai-nilai budaya yang bertahan lama. Di luar analisis deskriptif, studi ini berargumen bahwa keberlanjutan dalam pariwisata warisan budaya beroperasi sebagai proses semiotika di mana makna itu sendiri menjadi kendaraan bagi pelestarian dan adaptasi budaya. Pembingkaian ulang teoretis ini memajukan studi semiotika dengan memosisikan autentisitas dan keberlanjutan bukan sekadar sebagai hasil manajerial, melainkan sebagai sistem tanda yang terus berevolusi. Secara praktis, temuan ini memandu pemasar warisan budaya dan pembuat kebijakan dalam merancang strategi komunikasi yang menjaga integritas budaya sekaligus tetap relevan bagi audiens kontemporer.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bratić, I., & Kardum Goleš, I. (2023). Developing Sustainability By Rediscovering The Concept Of Authenticity. Diem Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting, 8(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.17818/DIEM/2023/1.1
Chhabra, D. (2009). Proposing a sustainable marketing framework for heritage tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495758
Chua, M. H. Y. (2021). Macau Squares: Discerning the Triadic Sign Model of Built-Heritage. Sustainability, 13(13), 7024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137024
Dai, T., Zheng, X., & Yan, J. (2021). Contradictory or aligned? The nexus between authenticity in heritage conservation and heritage tourism, and its impact on satisfaction. Habitat International, 107, 102307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102307
Geçikli, R. M., Turan, O., Lachytová, L., Dağlı, E., Kasalak, M. A., Uğur, S. B., & Guven, Y. (2024). Cultural Heritage Tourism and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 16(15), 6424. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156424
Kilstrup, M. (2015). Naturalizing semiotics: The triadic sign of Charles Sanders Peirce as a systems property. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 119(3), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.08.013
Kirtiklis, K., Laužikas, R., Kelpšienė, I., & Dallas, C. (2023). An Ontology of Semiotic Activity and Epistemic Figuration of Heritage, Memory, and Identity Practices on Social Network Sites. Sage Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231187367
Laing, J. (2011). Sustainable marketing of cultural and heritage tourism. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 6(2), 173–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2011.558756
Lin, Y. C., & Liu, Y. C. (2018). Deconstructing the internal structure of perceived authenticity for heritage tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(12), 2134–2152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1545022
Loulanski, T., & Loulanski, V. (2011). The sustainable integration of cultural heritage and tourism: a meta-study. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(7), 837–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.553286
MacCannell, D. (2013). The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class. Univ of California Press.
Orts-Cardador, J. J., Pérez-Galvéz, J. C., Fuentes, G. M. G.-C., & Alba, C. A. J. (2024). Heritage Tourism: A Bibliometric Analysis Over Three Decades (1994-2023). GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 55(3), 1164–1173. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.55317-1289
Papadaki, E. (2024). Promoting Green Tourism Synergies with Cultural and Creative Industries: A Case Study of Greece. Sustainability, 16(2), 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020633
Paraskevaidis, P., & Weidenfeld, A. (2021). Perceived and projected authenticity of visitor attractions as signs: A Peircean semiotic analysis. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 19, 100515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100515
Peirce, C. S. (1934). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (C. Harston & P. Weiss, Eds.; Vol. 5). Harvard University Press.
Qiu, Q., Zuo, Y., & Zhang, M. (2022). Intangible Cultural Heritage in Tourism: Research Review and Investigation of Future Agenda. Land, 11(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010139
Saussure, F. De. (1981). Course in General Linguistics (Fourth)—The Chaucer Press Ltd.
Su, J. (2018). Conceptualising the subjective authenticity of intangible cultural heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24(9), 919–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1428662
Suprapti, A., & Iskandar, I. (2020). Reading the meaning of architectural work in a living heritage. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 402(1), 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/402/1/012023
Thomsen, R. C., & Vester, S. P. (2016). Towards a Semiotics-Based Typology of Authenticities in Heritage Tourism: Authenticities at Nottingham Castle, UK, and Nuuk Colonial Harbour, Greenland. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 16(3), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2015.1084148
Timothy, D. J. (2018). Making sense of heritage tourism: Research trends in a maturing field of study. Tourism Management Perspectives, 25, 177–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.11.018
Vallverdu-Gordi, M., & Marine-Roig, E. (2023). The Role of Graphic Design Semiotics in Environmental Awareness Campaigns. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4299. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054299
Włodarczyk, A. (2022). Concepts and Categories: A Data Science Approach to Semiotics. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 67(1), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2022-0010
Yang, Z.-T., Ruan, W.-Q., Zhang, S.-N., & Cheng, Z.-C. (2024). Revealing the metaphorical code: Heterogeneous effects and mechanisms of tourism advertising style in cultural heritage sites. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 59, 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2024.05.001
Yi, X., Fu, X., Lin, V. S., & Xiao, H. (2022). Integrating Authenticity, Well-being, and Memorability in Heritage Tourism: A Two-Site Investigation. Journal of Travel Research, 61(2), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520987624
Zhang, S.-N., Huang, H., Ruan, W.-Q., & Li, Y.-Q. (2025). How can tourism advertising language make cultural heritage sites more popular? Journal of Vacation Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667251320112
Zhang, T., & Yin, P. (2020). Testing the structural relationships of tourism authenticity. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 18, 100485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100485
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.



.png)