Kemampuan Pedagogik Mahasiswa PPG Daljab dalam Pengembangan Video Pembelajaran

Bambang Sulistyo, Darningwati Darningwati, Nurhasanah Nurhasanah, Henny Yulia, Nora Agustina

Abstract

This study aims to describe the pedagogical competence of in-service Teacher Professional Education (PPG Daljab) students in Indonesian Language Education in developing learning videos for the Performance Assessment of PPG Daljab Batch 5. The study employed a descriptive quantitative approach involving 48 students as research subjects. Data were collected through an assessment of learning videos using a pedagogical competence rubric covering alignment with the lesson plan, lesson opening, material presentation, instructional strategies and interaction, media use, language and intonation, and lesson closure and reflection. The results indicate that, classically, students’ pedagogical competence ranged from good to very good. The lesson opening aspect achieved a very good category, while instructional strategies and interaction as well as media use were categorized as sufficient. These findings suggest that PPG Daljab students possess adequate pedagogical competence in developing learning videos; however, improvements are still needed in enhancing interactivity and optimizing digital media use. This study provides implications for strengthening pedagogical development in the PPG Daljab program.

 

Abstrak

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan pedagogik mahasiswa Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) Dalam Jabatan (Daljab) Bidang Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia dalam pengembangan video pembelajaran pada Ujian Kinerja PPG Daljab Gelombang 5. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif dengan subjek penelitian sebanyak 48 mahasiswa. Data dikumpulkan melalui penilaian video pembelajaran menggunakan rubrik kemampuan pedagogik yang mencakup kesesuaian dengan modul, pembukaan pembelajaran, penyajian materi, strategi dan interaksi, penggunaan media, bahasa dan intonasi, serta penutup dan refleksi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara klasikal kemampuan pedagogik mahasiswa berada pada kategori baik hingga sangat baik. Aspek pembukaan pembelajaran memperoleh kategori sangat baik, sementara aspek strategi dan interaksi serta penggunaan media berada pada kategori cukup. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa PPG Daljab telah memiliki kompetensi pedagogik yang memadai dalam pengembangan video pembelajaran, namun masih memerlukan penguatan pada aspek interaktivitas dan pemanfaatan media digital. Penelitian ini berimplikasi pada pengembangan kebijakan dan praktik pembinaan pedagogik dalam program PPG Daljab.

Keywords

pedagogical competence; learning video; in-service teacher education; Indonesian language education

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anderson, T. (2017). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Athabasca University Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.01

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Bates, A. W. (2019). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Tony Bates Associates Ltd. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0371346

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119239086

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

Firdaus, W., Eliya, I., & Sodik, A. J. F. (2020). The importance of character education in higher education (University) in building the quality students. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (Vol. 59, pp. 2602-2606).

Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355

Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2014). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. Dalam R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., hlm. 279–315). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.015

Mercer, N. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X479853

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Mulyasa, E. (2017). Standar kompetensi dan sertifikasi guru. Remaja Rosdakarya.

OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results: Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners (Vol. 1). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en

Putri, R. I., & Sari, D. P. (2022). Efektivitas video pembelajaran interaktif terhadap hasil belajar siswa sekolah menengah. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 24(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v24i2.28541

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2017). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use. Computers & Education, 108, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.008

van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826

Widodo, A., & Riandi, R. (2018). Dual-mode teacher professional development: Challenges and re-visioning future TPD in Indonesia. Teacher Development, 17(3), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2013.813757

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Zainuddin, Z., & Perera, C. J. (2019). Exploring students' competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1356916

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/sawer.v32i1.1672

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.