Analisis Bahasa dalam Buku Pengayaan Digital Literasi Bermuatan Eco Green untuk Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the linguistic characteristics in digital literacy enrichment books with eco green content for junior high school students. The main focus of the research is how language is used contextually, transformatively, and interactively to build environmental awareness and improve students' literacy skills. This research used a qualitative approach with content analysis method. Data collection techniques included document analysis of digital books, observation of students' interaction with interactive features, and structured interviews with teachers and linguists. The data were analysed through three stages: text identification based on environmental themes, categorization into three linguistic approaches, and evaluation of language effectiveness through source triangulation. The results showed that the selection of specific diction, imperative sentence structure, and integration of digital features such as video tutorials and interactive infographics were able to connect environmental concepts with students' real actions. Language in the book does not only function as a conveyor of information, but also as an instrument of identity formation, active participation, and transformation of learning into meaningful social practices. This research confirms the important role of language in creating holistic and sustainability-oriented digital literacy media.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis karakteristik kebahasaan dalam buku pengayaan digital literasi yang bermuatan eco green untuk siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Fokus utama penelitian adalah bagaimana bahasa digunakan secara kontekstual, transformasional, dan interaktif untuk membangun kesadaran lingkungan serta meningkatkan keterampilan literasi siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis konten. Teknik pengumpulan data meliputi analisis dokumen terhadap buku digital, observasi interaksi siswa dengan fitur interaktif, serta wawancara terstruktur dengan guru dan ahli linguistik. Data dianalisis melalui tiga tahap: identifikasi teks berdasarkan tema lingkungan, kategorisasi ke dalam tiga pendekatan kebahasaan, dan evaluasi efektivitas bahasa melalui triangulasi sumber. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemilihan diksi spesifik, struktur kalimat imperatif, dan integrasi fitur digital seperti video tutorial dan infografis interaktif mampu menghubungkan konsep lingkungan dengan tindakan nyata siswa. Bahasa dalam buku tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai penyampai informasi, tetapi juga sebagai instrumen pembentukan identitas, partisipasi aktif, dan transformasi pembelajaran menjadi praktik sosial yang bermakna. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya peran bahasa dalam menciptakan media literasi digital yang holistik dan berorientasi pada keberlanjutan
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Albaburrahim, & Amin, M. B. (2024). Analisis Pendekatan Ekologi dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Era Digital. GHANCARAN Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 671-683. https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.vi.17930
Albay, I. A., & Pradana, D. R. F. (2025). Pengaruh Perkembangan Kognitif Anak Terhadap Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Research Student, 2(1), 236-248. https://doi.org/10.61722/jirs.v2i1.3641
Allan, L. (2013). Defining critical literacy. In Moving critical literacies forward. Routledge, United States of Americ
Álvarez-Bueno, Celia, Pesce, Caterina, Cavero-Redondo, Iván, Sánchez-López, Mairena, Martínez-Hortelano, José Alberto, & Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente. (2017). The Effect of Physical Activity Interventions on Children's Cognition and Metacognition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 56(9), 729-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.06.012
Anwas, E. O. M., Afriansyah, A., Iftitah, K. N., Firdaus, W., Sugiarti, Y., Sopandi, E., & Hediana, D. (2022). Students' Literacy Skills and Quality of Textbooks in Indonesian Elementary Schools. International Journal of Language Education, 6(3), 233-244.
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., Roth, W., & Holthuis, N. (2018). Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes: A review and analysis of research. Journal of Environmental Education, 49(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1366155
Beers, K, & Probst, E. (2017). Disrupting Thinking: Why How We Read Matters.
Bizzell, P. (1991). Classroom Authority and Critical Pedagogy. American Literary History, 3(4), 847-863.
https://doi.org/10.1093/alh/3.4.847
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning. (12), 1-98.
Brian, S. (2003). What's 'New' in New Literacy Studies? Critical Approaches to Literacy in Theory and Practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.52214/cice.v5i2.11369
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2013). New Literacies, New Learning. Multiliteracies, 1-30.
https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0136/CGP/v30i02/1-15
Decuyper, A., Tack, H., V, Bénédicte., Simons, Mathea, & Vanderlinde, Ruben. (2023). Collaboration and Shared Responsibility in Team Teaching: A Large-Scale Survey Study. Education Sciences, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090896
DuBois, B., Krasny, M. E., & Russ, Alex. (2019). Online professional development for environmental educators: strategies to foster critical thinking and social interactions. Environmental Education Research, 25(10), 1479-1494. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1564247
Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 93-106.
Fadila, S. A., & Sylvia, I. (2024). Upaya Peningkatan Partisipasi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Sosiologi Fase E Melalui Media Teka-Teki Silang dan Model Pembelajaran Teams Games Tournament di SMA Negeri 1 VII Koto Sungai Sarik. Naradidik 3, 309-317. https://doi.org/10.24036/nara.v3i3.236
Febriyanti, E. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Terhadap Critical Thinking Skills Siswa Pada Materi Pembelajaran Ipa Di Mts Al-Quran Harsallakum Kota Bengkulu. UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu.
Freebody, P., & Freiberg, J. M. (2011). The teaching and learning of critical literacy. Handbook of Reading Research: IV (4), 432-452. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840412-23
Freire, P. (2005). Education for Critical Consciousness. Education for Critical Consciousness, pp. 1-145. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350190184
Gee, J. P. (2007). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses ? (1990). Basingstoke: Falmer Press, 203 pp. In Linguistics and Education 3. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203944806
Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction. In Journal of Social History. 44. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh.2010.0055
Hadiwijaya, A. S. (2023). Sintesa Teori Konstruksi Sosial Realitas Dan Konstruksi Sosial Media Massa. DIALEKTIKA KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 11(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.33592/dk.v11i1.3498
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic : the social interpretation of language and meaning. In American Anthropologist, New Series. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1981.83.3.02a00360
Hanafi, H., & Rohaemi, R. (2024). Peningkatan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Melalui Multimedia. Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.32806/jkpi.v5i1.134
Handayani, W. (2023). Handayani, W. (2023). Multimodal, Semiotika dan Terjemahan Slogan Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar: Visual dan Pesan Verbal dalam Pandangan Islam. Jurnal Kemuhammadiyahan Dan Integrasi Ilmu, 1.2, 84-99.
https://doi.org/10.24853/jkii.1.2.84-99
Imran., H, Ahmad., & Gunawan. (2017). Efek Multimedia Pembelajaran pada Kemampuan Siswa Menjawab Soal Analisis Energi pada Perubahan Wujud Air: Sebuah Tinjauan pada Siswa Kelas X Sman 3 Mataram. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 1(1), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v1i1.234
Janks, H. (2019). Critical Literacy and the Importance of Reading With and Against a Text. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 62(5), 561-564. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.941
Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (2006). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462970030205
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32, 241-267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07310586
Juariah, A. S. (2024). Membaca Tanpa Memahami: Tantangan Keterampilan Membaca Pemahaman di Sekolsh Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dan Filsafat, 2(4), 157-163.
https://doi.org/10.59581/garuda.v2i4.4514
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
Kress, G. (2006). Literacy in the New Media Age (review). In Language (Vol. 82). https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0242
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). Digital Literacy and Digital Literacies : Policy, Pedagogy and Research Considerations for Education. Digital Kompetanse, 1(12-24), 2006-2016.
https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2006-01-03
Lantolf, J., Thorne, S. L., & Poehner, M. (2015). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. In. B. van Patten & J. Williams (eds.). Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 207-226.
Latuputty, T., Magrib, N. I. D., & Sakliressy. (2022). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Air Melalui Sistem Biopori Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Konservasi Air Tanah (Studi Kasus : Dusun Airlouw Lapang, RT 004 Kecamatan Nusaniwe, Kota Ambon). Manumata: Jurnal Ilmu Teknik, 10(1), 1-52. https://doi.org/10.21608/pshj.2022.250026
Lemke, J. (2002). Language, Literacy, and Social Practice. The Open University
Llinares, A., & McCabe., A. (2023). Systemic functional linguistics: the perfect match for content and language integrated learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 26(3), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1635985
Martin, J. R. (2016). Meaning matters: A short history of systemic functional linguistics. Word, 62(1), 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2016.1141939
Maulia, S., & Purnomo, H. (2023). Peran Komunikasi Efektif Guru dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar (SD). Jurnal PGSD STKIP PGRI Banjarmasin, 5(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.33654/pgsd
Mendie, J, G., & Udofia, S. N. (2019). Language and the conception of reality. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 2(4), 121-124. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v2i4.53
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments: Special issue on interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
Mustofa, I., Ahmad B., Mas, & Awalatul Badar, Zico. (2022). The application of sustainable organic farming with hydroponic system for farmers in Gending Village. Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang, 7(1), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.26905/abdimas.v7i1.6334
Ng, Wan. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers and Education, 59(3), 1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Fairclough, N. (2004). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research, Norman Fairclough, Routledge,. In Linguistics and Education (Vol. 15).
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 45(3), 255-287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295
Perdiawan, Z., & Tini, Kartini. (2021). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Environmental Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa. Binomial, 4(2), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.46918/bn.v4i2.1063
Permatasari., A. K., & Rahardi, R. K. (2022). Mapping Metaphoric and Naturalistic Ecolinguistic Dimensions in Learning the Indonesian Language At the University. Jurnal Kata, 6(2), 308-320. https://doi.org/10.22216/kata.v6i2.1362
Rahmawati., Ristanto, R. H., & Miarsyah, M. (2021). Environmental Education Infographics by Instagram: Digital Learning Material Increasing Motivation During the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal on Advanced Science, Education, and Religion, 4(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.33648/ijoaser.v4i1.95
Ruddamayanti. (2019). Pemanfaatan Buku Digital dalam Meningkatkan Minat Baca. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 2, 1193-1202.
Saputra, E., Wahyudin., & Nurlaelah, E. (2012). Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Anchored Intruction Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis dan Self Concept Siswa. Disertasi Upi Bandung, 10(2), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.17509/sigmadidaktika.v1i1.49407
Selvimar, E., & Gani, E., (2019). Korelasi Penguasaan Kosakata Bidang Lingkungan Hidup Dengan Keterampilan Menulis Teks Berita Siswa Kelas Viii Smp Negeri 18 Padang. Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 8(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.24036/103917-019883
Sholihah, M. (2025). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Integrated Reading And Composition (Circ) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Mata Pelajaran Ipas Kelas Iv Di Sdn 3 Banyuwangi Pringsewu Lampung. Skripsi : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung.
Steffensen., S., & Fill, A. (2014). Ecolinguistics: The state of the art and future horizons. Language Sciences, 41, 6-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003
Sterling, S. (2011). Transformative Learning and Sustainability: Sketching the Conceptual Ground. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. 5.
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. Routledge.
Susanto, R. U. (2019). Integrasi Konsep Adiwiyata Berbasis Ekolinguistik di Lembaga Pendidikan Kabupaten Jombang. Discoveri: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 04(02), 472-480.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on adakites. International Geology Review, 63(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2019.1702592
Trilling, & Fadel, C. (2009). 21St Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Choice Reviews Online, 47(10), 243. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-5788
Verasari, A. I. (2022). Metafora dalam Buku Kumpulan Puisi" Hujan Bulan Juni" Karya Sapardi Djoko Damono. Dinamika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya, 5(1), 16-23.
https://doi.org/10.35194/jd.v5i1.1844
Warschauer, M. (2007). The paradoxical future of digital learning. Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11519-007-0001-5
Wibowo, T. I. A. & Zakiyah, E. (2022). Pembuatan Biopori Untuk Resapan Air Hujan Dan Pemanfaatan Sampah Organik. BERNAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(3), 387-392. https://doi.org/10.31949/jb.v3i3.1798
Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why Don't Students Like School?: A Cognitive Scientist Answers. 4-13.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269527
Yasin, F. N. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Konstektual Berbasis Budaya Lokal terhadap Keterampilan Sosial Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Modeling: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 10(1), 366-380. https://doi.org/10.69896/modeling.v10i1.1721
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.




.png)