Penanda Fatis Sosial-Politik: Perspektif Pragmatik Diskursif-Integratif Epistemologis

Kristina Marta Noviance, R. Kunjana Rahardi

Abstract

The objective of this study is to describe the findings on the forms, pragmatic meanings, and functions of phatic markers in sociopolitical internet media, using an epistemologically-based discursive-integrative pragmatic perspective. The data consist of manifestations of forms, pragmatic meanings, and functions of phatic markers in sociopolitical discourse on internet platforms. The substantive data sources are sociopolitical texts containing phatic markers across various online platforms. The data collection method employed is the observation method, using recording and note-taking techniques. Data collection concluded upon the identification of clear classifications and types of data ready for appropriate analysis methods and techniques. The technique applied in the analysis is the comparative relationship technique. This study has produced the following findings: (1) The markers “Come On,” “Yes, Right?” and “Nah” to express the intention to convince; (2) The markers “I apologize inwardly”, “I appreciate”, and “Please…” to build an image and power relations; (3) The markers “Yes, right!”, narrative repetition, and personalization of reality to frame the narrative of optimism; (4) The markers “Nah”, “I am sure”, and “Yes” to express the intention of optimism; (5) The markers “Mr. President”, Causal Structure, and Digital Diction “Banget” as strategies for legitimization, rationalization, and audience adaptation; (6) The phatic markers “If You Can”, “99.9 Percent”, and “Can’t Live Him Back” as strategies for modulation, rationalization, and emotionalization in leadership representation.

 

Abstrak

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan hasil riset bentuk, makna pragmatik, dan fungsi penanda fatis sosial-politik media internet dalam perspektif pragmatik diskursif-integratif berbasis epistemologis. Data berupa manifestasi bentuk, makna pragmatik, dan fungsi penanda fatis sosial-politik dalam media internet. Sumber data substantif penelitian ini adalah teks-teks sosial-politik yang mengandung penanda-penanda kefatisan dalam berbagai platform internet. Metode pengumpulan data yang diterapkan adalah metode simak dengan teknik rekam dan catat. Metode analisis data yang diterapkan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode analisis padan ekstralingual. Metode analisis padan ini lazim disebut sebagai metode kontekstual. Selanjutnya teknik yang diterapkan dalam rangka analisis data tersebut adalah teknik hubung banding. Penelitian ini telah menghasilkan temuan-temuan berikut ini: (1) Penanda “Come On,” “Iya, Kan?” dan “Nah” untuk menyatakan maksud meyakinkan; (2) Penanda “Mohon maaf lahir batin”, “Saya apresiasi”, dan “Silakan…” untuk membangun citra dan relasi kekuasaan; (3) Penanda “Iya, kan!”, pengulangan naratif, dan personalisasi realitas untuk membingkai narasi optimisme; (4) Penanda “Nah”, “Saya yakin”, dan “Ya” untuk menyatakan maksud optimis; (5) Penanda “Bapak Presiden”, Struktur Kausal, dan Diksi Digital “Banget” sebagai strategi legitimasi, rasionalisasi, dan adaptasi Audiens dalam Pidato Sri Mulyani; (6) Penanda Fatis Sosial-Politik “Kalau Bisa”, “99,9 Persen”, dan “Nggak Bisa Hidupkan Dia Kembali” sebagai Strategi Modulasi, Rasionalisasi, dan Emosionalisasi dalam Representasi Kepemimpinan.

Keywords

Penanda fatis; diskursus sosial-politik; diskursif-integratif; pragmatik integratif

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdulrahman, A. W. (2016). An Introduction to Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v4i1.9423

Bergsträßer, S., Hildebrandt, T., Rensing, C., & Steinmetz, R. (2009). Virtual Context Based Services for Multiplayer Online Games to Facilitate Community Participation. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 45(1-3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-009-0293-9

Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, Learning and Communication: A Social Semiotic Frame. In Multimodality, Learning and Communication: A Social Semiotic Frame. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687537

Coupland, J., Coupland, N., & Robinson, J. D. (1992). "How Are You?": Negotiating Phatic Communion. Language in Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015268

Derewianka, B. & Jones, P. (2012). Teaching Language in Context. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2012.06.007

González-Lloret, M. (2022). Technology-Mediated Tasks for The Development of L2 Pragmatics. Language Teaching Research, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211064930

Hapsari, E. D., Rizaldy, D. R., & Khakim, I. A. (2021). Analysis of the Meaning of Pragmatics of Fatisanity in Class Discussions. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 15(2), 149-159.

https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v15i2.111033

Haugh, M. (2008). Intention in Pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip.2008.006

Haugh, M. (2013). Im/Politeness, Social Practice and The Participation Order. Journal of Pragmatics, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003

Haugh, M. (2015). Impoliteness and Taking Offence in Initial Interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.018

Kurnianta, P., & Maharani, S. D. (2020). Refleksi Aksiologis atas Teori Bahasa Noam Chomsky dan M.A.K Halliday. Diksi, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v28i2.33080

Leech, G. (2007). Politeness: Is There an East-West Divide? In Journal of Politeness Research. https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.009

Li, H., & Wang, M. (2016). Culpeper, Jonathan & Haugh, Michael: Pragmatics and the English language. Intercultural Pragmatics, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2016-0026

Limberg, H. (2015). Principles for Pragmatics Teaching: Apologies in the EFL Classroom. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv012

Mahsun. (2007). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya (Edisi Revisi). Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mahsun, M. (2005). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1991

Malinowski, B. (1939). The Group and The Individual in Functional Analysis. The American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/218181

Muñoz, M. C. (2022). Translation and Multimodality. Beyond Words. Translation Studies, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2020.1822204

Onwuegbuzie, A., & Leech, N. (2005). On Becoming a Pragmatic Researcher: The Importance of Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500402447

Rahardi, K. (2016). Personal and Communal Assumptions to Determine Pragmatic Meanings of Phatic Functions. Lingua Cultura, 10(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v10i2.897

Rahardi, R. K. (2020a). Ketriaditisan Konteks Pragmatik Tuturan Tidak Santun: Perspektif Kultur Spesifik. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v9i1.2340

Rahardi, R. K. (2020b). Konteks dalam Perspektif Cyberpragmatics. 2, 151-163.

https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v38i2.132

Rahardi, R. K., & Budhiono, R. H. (2024). Information Layers of Ostentive Communication of Hoaxes in the Perspective of Relevance Theory of Sperber & Wilson. SUAR BETANG, 19(2), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.26499/surbet.v19i2.23484

Saifudin, A. (2019). Konteks dalam Studi Linguistik Pragmatik. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v14i2.2323

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2012a). Introduction: Pragmatics. In Meaning and Relevance. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.002

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2012b). Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. In Meaning and Relevance. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.016

Sudaryanto. (2016). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa (1st ed.). Sanata Dharma University Press.

Terkourafi, M., & Bezuidenhout, A. (2021). Special issue: (Im)Politeness, Humour, and The Role of Intentions: Essays Presented to Michael Haugh: Guest Editors' Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics, 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.015

Trinh, N. T. T., Hoa, P. Van, & Phuc, T. H. (2017). Halliday's Functional Grammar: Philosophical Foundation and Epistemology. Jurnal Humaniora, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v29i2.24295

Verdonck, M., & Maye, F. (2016). Enhancing Occupational Performance in The Virtual Context Using Smart Technology. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022615591172

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.