“Ya” dalam Tindak Komunikasi Pembelajaran Daring: Studi Cyberpragmatics
Abstract
The word "ya" in Indonesian has developed in both meaning and usage. This evolution has not yet received much attention from language scholars. This article is based on research into the function of the word "ya" in speech acts during online learning. The goal of this article is to describe the various functions of "ya" in online learning communication from a cyberpragmatics perspective. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach. The data used in this research consist of speech acts in learning interactions that include the word "ya." Data sources in this study are speech acts within online learning. Data were collected through documentation, observation, and note-taking techniques. Data analysis employed referential and pragmatic matching methods. Findings reveal that "ya" functions in online learning speech acts as follows: (1) to express agreement, (2) to affirm, (3) to emphasize a statement, (4) as an exclamation, (5) as a response to a call, and (6) to soften communication. These findings indicate that "ya" plays a highly versatile role in communication, whether for agreement, affirmation, indicating understanding, or maintaining conversational flow. The use of "ya" can vary by context and intonation, thus imparting different nuances in verbal interactions.
Abstrak
Kata “ya” dalam bahasa Indonesia memiliki perkembangan makna dan maksud. Perkembangan tersebut belum menjadi perhatian pemerhati bahasa. Artikel ini didasarkan pada penelitian tentang fungsi kata “ya” dalam tindak komunikasi pembelajaran daring. Adapun tujuan dari artikel ini untuk mendeskripsikan fungsi kata “ya” dalam komunikasi pembelajaran yang dilakukan secara daring berperspektif cyberpragmatics. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Data yang digunakan yaitu tindak komunikasi dalam pembelajaran yang menggunakan kata “ya” yang bersumber dari tindak komunikasi dalam pembelajaran daring. Data tersebut dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan teknik dokumentasi, simak, dan dilanjutkan dengan teknik catat. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode padan referensial dan padan pragmatik. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan fungsi kata “ya” dalam tindak komunikasi pembelajaran daring meliputi: (1) menyatakan persetujuan, (2) menegaskan, (3) memberikan tekanan pada suatu pernyataan, (4) kata seru, (5) kata untuk menyahut panggilan, dan (6) penghalusan dalam berkomunikasi. Temuan ini menunjukkan kata "ya" memiliki peran yang sangat fleksibel dalam komunikasi, baik untuk menyetujui, menegaskan, menunjukkan pemahaman, atau menjaga kelancaran percakapan. Penggunaan kata "ya" bisa bervariasi sesuai konteks dan intonasi, sehingga memberikan makna yang berbeda dalam interaksi verbal.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anwar, M., Amir, F. R., Herlina, Anoegrajekti, N., & Muliastuti, L. (2021). Language Impoliteness among Indonesians on Twitter. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(4), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3704-10
https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3704-10
Astuti, S. P. (2017). Analisis Fungsi Sintaksis Kata Apa dan Mana dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 12(4), 206. https://doi.org/10.14710/nusa.12.4.206-215
https://doi.org/10.14710/nusa.12.4.206-215
Banegas, D. L. (2020). Qualitative research topics in language teacher education (Book Review). Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 43, 100826. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100826
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100826
Boczkowski, P., & Papacharissi, Z. (2018). Trump and The Media. MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11464.001.0001
Buczowski, M., & Strukowska, M. E. (2022). Speech act-based legitimisation in selected inaugural speeches of British Prime Ministers. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia, 22(3), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.14746/snp2022.22.02
https://doi.org/10.14746/snp2022.22.02
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Culpeper, J. (2021). Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 4-11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.019
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.019
Gusthini, M., Sobarna, C., & Amalia, R. M. (2018). A pragmatic study of speech as an instrument of power: Analysis of the 2016 USA presidential debate. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(1), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v5i1.6906
https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v5i1.6906
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Edward Arnold.
Hartuti, S., & Nurfarida, I. (2018). Tindak Tutur dan Fungsi Kata Bi dan Ba dalam Proses Komunikasi Bahasa Dayak Studi Kasus pada Masyarakat Riam Durian. ETNOLINGUAL, 1(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.20473/etno.v1i1.7393
https://doi.org/10.20473/etno.v1i1.7393
Helmiyanti, L. (2020). Bentuk dan Fungsi Kata Umpatan Mengakrabkan Suasana di Kalangan Mahasiswa. Parole (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia), 3(4), 657-664. https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/parole/article/view/5269
Imbang, D. (2014). Bentuk-makna dan fungsi kata tugas dalam bahasa melayu manado. Jurnal LPPM Bidang EkoSosBudKum, 1(1), 21-37. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lppmekososbudkum/article/view/7210
Ismail, I. N., Shanmuganathan, T., & Shaari, A. H. (2020). Defying out-group impoliteness: An analysis of users' defensive strategies in disputing online criticisms. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 20(1), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2001-08
https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2001-08
Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87-99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4194943/
https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman Group Limited.
Locher, M. A. (2013). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Journal of Pragmatics, 47(1), 128-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.002
Mahsun. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi Metode dan Tekniknya. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Maiza, S. (2021). Pola Kesantunan Berbahasa Tindak Tutur Direktif dalam Interaksi Belajar Mengajar di SMP Negeri 4 Sungai Penuh. Transformatika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 5(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.31002/transformatika.v5i1.3623
https://doi.org/10.31002/transformatika.v5i1.3623
Marlena, H. (2021). Fungsi Kata Bantu To dalam Cerita Pendek Itazuragitsune Karya Kubo Takashi. Japanese Reserach on Linguistics, Literature Adn Culture, 3(1), 79-99. https://doi.org/10.33633/jr.v3i1.4546
Moodie, I. (2020). Qualitative research topics in language teacher education language teacher education (Book Review). System, 90, 102239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102239
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102239
Nugraha, T. A., Soepardjo, D., & Nurhadi, D. (2022). Peran Umpatan dalam Bahasa Jepang: Kajian Sosiopragmatik. Journal of Japanese Language Education and Linguistics, 6(1), PRESS. https://doi.org/10.18196/jjlel.v6i1.12393
https://doi.org/10.18196/jjlel.v6i1.12393
Perniss, P. (2018). Why We Should Study Multimodal Language. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01109
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01109
Rahardi, K. (2020). Konteks Pragmatik dalam Perspektif Cyberpragmatics. Linguistik Indonesia, 38(2), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v38i2.132
https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v38i2.132
Rahardi, R. K. (2019). Mendeskripsi Peran Konteks Pragmatik: Menuju Perspektif Cyberpragmatics. Transformatika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 3(2), 164-178. https://doi.org/10.31002/transformatika.v
https://doi.org/10.31002/transformatika.v3i2.2333
Salimi, E. A., & Mortazavi, S. M. (2024). Impoliteness in Twitter Discourse: a Case Study of Replies to Donald Trump and Greta Thunberg. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 14(2), 86-107. https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.14.2024.06
https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.14.2024.06
Sameer, I. H. (2017). The analysis of speech acts patterns in two Egyptian inaugural speeches. Studies in English Language and Education, 4(2), 134-147. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v4i2.7271
https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v4i2.7271
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Act: An Essay on the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Sanata Dharma University Press.
Sulistyorini, T. B., Setiawaty, R., Haryanti, P., & Rahmawati, L. E. (2018). Pergeseran Fungsi Kata Mohon dalam Realisasi Komunikasi Melalui Whatsapp: Penyimpangan Prinsip Kesopanan. SENASBASA (Seminar Bahasa Dan Satra), 488-494. http://research-report.umm.ac.id/index.php/SENASBASA
Sykes, J. M. (2011). Ciberpragmática 2.0: Nuevos usos del lenguaje en Internet [Cyberpragmatics 2.0: New Uses of Language on the Internet]. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(10), 2664-2666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.009
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics. Internet-mediated communication in context. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213
Yus, F. (2016). Towards a cyberpragmatics of mobile instant messaging. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016 (pp. 7-26). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41733-2_2
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.




.png)
