Kolaborasi Bahasa, Seni, Sastra, dan Budaya dalam Produksi Rumah Budaya Multikultural Berbasis Ekonomi Kreatif untuk Peningkatan Income Generating
Abstract
This research aims to prepare the production of multicultural cultural houses to increase UNY's income generation from a creative economy perspective. This effort is expected to support UNY's vision and mission as a world-class university while simultaneously increasing UNY's income generation in the era of PTNBH (State-Owned Legal Entities). The production of multicultural cultural houses is realized through collaboration between study programs within the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FBSB) UNY, utilizing the potential of local language, art, literature, and culture that are marketable as creative economy commodities. This study utilizes the theory of exploratory and collaborative cultural house production development, related to the empowerment of local language, art, literature, and culture. The research method used is qualitative, encompassing heuristic, exploratory, and negotiative approaches, which serve as analytical tools to develop Javanese cultural entrepreneurship packages as a competitive advantage. The results indicate that the production of multicultural cultural houses can be achieved through two steps. First, the development of a pranatacara package that utilizes panyandra practices, which are related to the ethnomathematic concept of spiritual hydrology, is realized through the empowerment of macapat songs in the siraman manten tradition. Second, the empowerment of collaborative elements of language, art, literature, and culture from an ethnobotanical perspective in the Panggih Manten tradition, where panyandra is embodied in the form of parikan (pantun) and macapat songs combined with gending (traditional music).
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan menyiapkan produksi rumah budaya multikultural untuk meningkatkan income generating UNY dalam perspektif ekonomi kreatif. Upaya ini diharapkan mampu mendukung visi dan misi UNY sebagai world class university sekaligus meningkatkan income generating UNY di era PTNBH. Produksi rumah budaya multikultural diwujudkan melalui kolaborasi antarprogram studi di lingkungan FBSB UNY, dengan memanfaatkan potensi bahasa, seni, sastra, dan budaya lokal yang layak jual sebagai komoditas ekonomi kreatif. Kajian ini menggunakan teori pengembangan produksi rumah budaya secara eksploratif dan kolaboratif, yang berkaitan dengan pemberdayaan karya bahasa, seni, sastra, dan budaya lokal. Metode penelitian yang digunakan bersifat kualitatif, mencakup heuristic, eksploratif, dan negosiatif, yang berfungsi sebagai alat analisis untuk menghasilkan paket wirausaha budaya Jawa sebagai keunggulan kompetitif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa produksi rumah budaya multikultural dapat ditempuh melalui dua hal. Pertama, pembentukan paket pranatacara yang memanfaatkan praktik panyandra, yang terkait dengan konsep etnomatematika hidrologi spiritual, diwujudkan melalui pemberdayaan tembang macapat dalam tradisi siraman manten. Kedua, pemberdayaan unsur kolaborasi bahasa, seni, sastra, dan budaya dalam perspektif etnobotani budaya pada tradisi panggih manten, di mana panyandra diwujudkan dalam bentuk parikan (pantun) dan tembang macapat yang dikolaborasikan dengan gending.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, T. A., Susilowati, N., Subkhan, E., & Amin, S. (2020). Historiopreneurship dan Peningkatan Income Generate di Jurusan Sejarah Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Semarang. E-Dimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 11(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26877/e-dimas
Bolland, & Collum, M. (2012). Community Environment Theory. Oxford University.
Boon, R., & Plastow, J. (2004). Theatre and empowerment: Community drama on the world stage. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth). Sage publications.
Dewi, R., & Dalimunthe, M. B. (2017). Peningkatan Income Generate Melalui Unit Usaha Counceling Centre Berbasis Intelektual Kampus. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 23(2), 287–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkm.v23i2.7027
Fenner, A.-B. (2001). Cultural Awareness and Language Awareness Based on Dialogic Interaction with Texts in Foreign Language Learning. Council of Europe.
Fitria, Y., Linda, M. R., & Patrisia, D. (2019). Upaya Peningkatan Income Generating Melalui Pelatihan Inovasi Produk Bagi Masyarakat Nelayan. Sabdamas, 1(1), 27–32.
Irmawati, W. (2013). Makna Simbolik Upacara Siraman Pengantin Adat Jawa. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 21(2), 309–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.21.2.247
Kavalir, M. (2015). House and Home Across Cultures. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 12(1), 29–47. https:/ doi.org/10.4312/elope.12.1.2947
Kramsch, C. (2014). Language and Culture. AILA Review, 27(1), 30–55.
Lestari, N., & Suyanto, S. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review About Local Wisdom and Sustainability: Contribution and Recommendation to Science Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), 23–94.
Malaikosa, Y. M. L., Widyadharma, A. P., & Pangestu, W. T. (2022). Curriculum and Learning Management: Integration of Creative Economy Value to Improve Students’ Life Skill. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 12(1), 76–85.
Marwanto, Endraswara, S., & Kuswarsantyo. (2025). Cultural and Artistic Dimensions in Javanese Traditional Dance: Comparative Case Studies of Bedhaya Mintaraga and Bedhaya Arjuna Wiwaha. Research in Dance Education, 1–15.
Milanguni, A. H., Yohanes, B., Pairin, U., & Ahmadi, A. (2025). Nilai Filosofis Tradisi Temu Manten Pada Prosesi Pernikahan Adat Jawa. Kopula: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pendidikan, 7(1), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.29303/kopula.v7i1.6190
Nardila, A. A. R. (2021). Makna Pepindhan Manusia dalam Panyandra Upacara Panggih Pengantin Adat Jawa Ragam Surakarta. Widyaparwa, 49(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.26499/wdprw.v49i1.680
Nas, P. J. M., & Prins, W. J. M. (1988). House, culture and development. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land-En Volkenkunde, (1ste Afl), 114–131.
Nas, P. J. M., & Van Der Sande, M.-L. (1985). Urban life-styles: A biographical approach’. City and Society: Studies in Urban Ethnicity, Life-Style and Class, 57–70.
Plastow, J. (2004). Dance and transformation: The Adugna community dance theatre, Ethiopia. Theatre and Empowerment: Community Drama on the World Stage, 125–154.
Prastawa, M. R. T., Werdiningsih, Y. K., & Zaidah, N. (2024). Makna Filosofis Teks Panyandra pada Upacara Panggih dalam Pernikahan Adat Jawa. Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2), 1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.33367/ijhass.v5i3.5527
Rapoport, A. (2003). Vernacular Architecture and The Cultural Determinants of Form. In Buildings and society. Routledge.
Rubbo, A. (1977). Changing Traditions in Housing. Cauca valley, Colombia. Ekistics. A Review on the Problems and Science of Human Settlements, 43(257), 213–220.
Santoso, R., & Aliffianto, A. Y. (2022). Creative Industry and Economic Recovery Strategies From Pandemic Disrupton. JIET (Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan), 7(1), 47–62.
Saputra, R. G. C., Demartoto, A., & Supriyadi, S. (2018). Reproduksi Wisata Budaya Kreatif (Studi Fenomenologi Reproduksi Wisata Budaya Tari oleh Sanggar Soerya Sumirat di Surakarta). Urban Crisis And Style Of Urban Demography BT - Seminar Nasional dan Konferensi Sosiologi Perkotaan 2018 (357–363).
Sa’ud, U. S. (2011). Inovasi Pendidikan. Alfabeta.
Simson, U. (1986). Development and Culture: Reflections on The Cultural Dimension of Socio-Economic Action. In The cultural dimension of development (74–77). The Hague: Netherlands Commission for UNESCO.
Soni, A., Karman, W. S., & Yanasari, W. (2024). Local Wisdom" Tabot and Batik Besurek" in Supporting City Branding Planning in Bengkulu Indonesia Province. Local Wisdom Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Kearifan Lokal, 16(2), 85–96.
Sulanjari, B. (2020). Macapat untuk Sungkeman Manten. Universitas PGRI.
Sumarjono. (2010). Strategi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. CV. Kanisius.
Suwarna. (2009). Bahasa Pewara. Pustaka Pelajar.
Syafaruddin, S., Asrul, A., & Mesiono, M. (2016). Inovasi pendidikan: suatu analisis terhadap kebijakan baru pendidikan. Perdana Publishing.
Turner, J. F. C., & Fichter, R. (Eds.). (1972). Freedom to Build: Dweller Control of the Housing Process. Collier Macmillan.
Turton, A. (1978). Architectural and political space in Thailand. In G. B. Milner (Ed.), Natural symbols in South-East Asia (113–132). London: SOAS.
Weber, M. (1964). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, I and II. Kiepenheuer und Witsch.
Wibowo, A. P., Sadeli, E. H., Pamungkas, O. Y., Irawan, D., Muryaningsih, S., & Faridli, E. M. (2023). Multiculturalism in Indonesia: how does literature affect the development of diversity? Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(10), 1787–1797.
Wulansari, D., Sukatmadirerja, N., & Benitez, S. M. R. (2024). Development Of Crative Industries Based on Local Wisdom as Driver of The Tourism Industry. Aplikasi Administrasi: Media Analisa Masalah Administrasi, 97–109.
Zimmerer, T., Scarborough, N. M., & Wilson, D. L. (2008). Essentials of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.



.png)