Personal and Interpersonal Linguistik Communication in Academic Writing

Diena San Fauziya, Yeti Mulyati, Andoyo Sastromiharjo, Dadang S. Anshori

Abstract

Academic writing as linguistic communication is often seen as an individual activity requiring critical thinking, in-depth knowledge, and language skills. However, it also involves interpersonal interactions with the academic community, supervisors, and readers. This article explores the personal and interpersonal aspects of academic writing and their impact on writing quality using literature review, theoretical analysis, and document analysis. The study found that personal aspects, such as motivation, idea development, and self-reflection, shape authenticity, while interpersonal feedback enhances clarity, cohesion, and adherence to academic standards. Linguistic analysis reveals personal elements through persona usage (e.g., I, the researcher), while interpersonal aspects appear in objective statements (e.g., this study shows that, as stated by). Thus, academic writing is a synergy of personal and interpersonal elements, essential for improving writing quality, especially for beginners.

 

Abstrak

Penulisan akademis sebagai salah satu aktivitas komunikasi linguistik sering kali dipandang sebagai aktivitas individual yang membutuhkan pemikiran kritis, pengetahuan mendalam, dan keterampilan berbahasa. Namun, hal itu juga melibatkan interaksi interpersonal dengan komunitas akademis, supervisor, dan pembaca. Artikel ini mengeksplorasi aspek personal dan interpersonal dari penulisan akademis dan dampaknya terhadap kualitas penulisan menggunakan tinjauan pustaka, analisis teoritis, dan analisis dokumen. Studi tersebut menemukan bahwa aspek personal, seperti motivasi, pengembangan ide, dan refleksi diri, membentuk keaslian, sementara umpan balik interpersonal meningkatkan kejelasan, kohesi, dan kepatuhan terhadap standar akademis. Analisis linguistik mengungkap elemen personal melalui penggunaan persona (misalnya, saya, peneliti), sementara aspek interpersonal muncul dalam pernyataan objektif (misalnya, studi ini menunjukkan bahwa, sebagaimana dinyatakan oleh). Dengan demikian, penulisan akademis merupakan sinergi dari elemen personal dan interpersonal, yang penting untuk meningkatkan kualitas penulisan, terutama bagi pemula.

Keywords

academic writing; communication linguistic strategies; interpersonal communication; personal communication

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aderibigbe, S. A. (2023). Undergraduate students ’ views about peer mentoring as a tool to enhance computer-supported collaborative learning. 15(4).

Brancu, C. (2023). Communication Strategies within the Public and Private Companies in Romania. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0037

Brown, P. (2017). Innovations in educational technology. International Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4), 210–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/ijet.2017.5678

Brown, P. (2021). The impact of self-motivation on innovative research outcomes among students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 567–580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jep.2021.5678

Dhobi, S. (2024). What , How and Why Academic Writing ? July, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.3126/hj.v15i2.70674

Elabdali, R. (2021). Are two heads really better than one? A meta-analysis of the L2 learning benefits of collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSLW.2020.100788

Fauziya, D. S., Mulyati, Y., Sastromiharjo, A., & Anshori, D. S. (2024). Pedagogical Communication Analysis in Training Scientific Articles Writing. 01, 119–126.

Garcia, M. (2020). Language acquisition in bilingual children. Journal of Language Studies, 33(4), 118–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jls.2020.5678

Gasman, M. (2006). Doing Academic Writing in Education: Connecting the Personal and the Professional (review). Journal of College Student Development, 47, 486 - 487. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0044.

Gurung, R. K. (2022). Why Academic Writing ? 6(2467), 75–82.

Hearn, J. (2018). Power, culture, identity, and the work of Anthony Smith. Nations and Nationalism, 24, 286–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/NANA.12407

Hyland, K. (2002). Academic writing and the role of voice. Journal of Writing and Pedagogy, 28(5), 50–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jwp.2002.5678

Johnson, R. (2020). Reflective practices in teaching ESL students. TESOL Journal, 22(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.12345

Kimani, B. (2023). Internal Communication Strategies and Employee Engagement. Journal of Public Relations, 2(1), 13–24.

Lazareva, L. (2024). Academic Writing and Personal Information Culture in Preparing Students to Write a Scientific Article. Standards and Monitoring in Education. https://doi.org/10.12737/1998-1740-2024-12-4-10-15.

Lee, S. (2018). The role of emotions in learning. Cognitive Science in Education, 12(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/cse.2018.5678

Lehman, I., De Celis, K., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2022). Writing to make a difference: Discursive analysis of writer identity in research articles on management. Ibérica. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.44.155.

McDonough, K., De Vleeschauwer, J., & Crawford, W. (2018). Comparing the quality of collaborative writing, collaborative prewriting, and individual texts in a Thai EFL context. System. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2018.02.010

Morga, D. (2021). Interpersonal Communication. Adoption & Culture, 4, 98–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110276794

Mustafa, M., , S., & Syahriani, I. (2023). Genre_Based SFL Analysis of Academic Writing in English: Investigating Linguistic Features and Genre Conventions in Student's Essay. Elite : English and Literature Journal. https://doi.org/10.24252/elite.v10i1.36563.

Nuoya, Z. (2024). Comments on Linguistic Features of Academic Writing: Based on the Article "Testing a Model of Teaching for Anxiety and Success for English Language Teaching". Lecture Notes on Language and Literature. https://doi.org/10.23977/langl.2024.070427.

Pereira, M. S. (2021). Personal communication and its impact on digital learning. 23–27. https://doi.org/10.15406/sij.2021.05.00250

Schippers, M., Morisano, D., Locke, E., Scheepers, A., Latham, G., & Jong, E. (2020). Writing about personal goals and plans regardless of goal type boosts academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101823

Sidorova, T. (2020). Communication Strategies : Interdisciplinary Tools of a Public Speaker. 27(3), 2020.

Sytnik, S., & Chebykin, O. (2021). ORIENTATION IN COMMUNICATION AS A PERSONAL RESOURCE OF EFFECTIVE INTERPERSONAL INTERACTION. Science and Education, 3, 22–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2021-3-4Олена

Tikhonova, E. (2024). Interpersonal Strategies in Academic Writing: The Significance of Acknowledging Research Limitations and Recommendations for Future Studies in Scientific Discourse. Хранение и переработка сельхозсырья. https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2023.4.526.

Williams, D. (2021). A study on student motivation in higher education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 14(3), 105–118.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jep.2021.5678

Yulinetska, Y., & Babii, O. (2021). THE FORMATION OF LINGUISTIC AND EXTRA-LINGUISTIC COMPETENCES FOR HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS IN ACADEMIC WRITING COURSE. The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University. Series: pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.25128/2415-3605.20.2.17.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/sawer.v31i1.1520

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.