Ciri Morfosemantik Afiks Derivasional {Ber-} dalam Konstruksi Verba Deajektival Bahasa Indonesia
Abstract
The Indonesian language has a unique grammatical construction for verbs, which is the product of a derivational process that results in a deadjectival verb (VDaj). These VDaj constructions are morphologically marked by the affix {ber-}. This affix is commonly utilized in the Indonesian language and can be found, for instance, in the form of {berberat hati}, {berbulat hati}, and {berputih hati}. A recent study aimed to identify and describe the affix {ber-} use in VDaj construction as a phenomenon of morphosemantics. The study utilized data in Indonesian sentences in which the affix {ber-} of VDaj had been structured as one of its constituents. The data sources for this study were the Indonesian-Leipzig Corpora Collection (ILCC) and Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI), and the data was obtained using the technique of textual documentation. The study analysis was done using the immediate defragmentation technique and referential comparison of meaning in the light of Derivational Morphology and Derivational Semantics. The analysis resulted in two main findings. First, the study found that the morphosemantic features of affix {ber-} could be construed to some extent if the affix had been distributed with one of the adjectival types. Second, the study identified at least three specific features of the affix in the VDaj of bI: (a) to form the VDaj in the type of STATE VERB, (b) to incorporate the semantic role of BENEFACTIVE in the argument of VDaj, and (c) in a narrow condition to create the RECIPROCAL meaning of VDaj. Overall, this study sheds light on the unique characteristics of the Indonesian language and provides valuable insights into the morphosemantic features of the affix {ber-} in VDaj construction.
Abstrak
Verba deajektival (VDaj) bahasa Indonesia (bI) merupakan salah satu struktur gramatikal yang dibentuk melalui derivasi. Kostruksi VDaj berpemarkah {ber-} merupakan struktur yang cenderung lazim dijumpai pada penggunaan bI, misalnya {berberat hati}, {berbulat hati}, dan {berputih hati}. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk memerikan karakter morfosemantis afiks {ber-} pada konstruksi VDaj bI tersebut. Data kajian ini berwujud kalimat bI yang berkonstituen konstruksi VDaj berpemarkah {ber-}. Sumber data kajian ini berwujud Indonesian – Leipzig Corpora Collection (ILCC) dan Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). Data dikumpulkan berdasarkan teknik catat atau dokumentasi tekstual. Data dianalisis berdasarkan teknik Bagi Unsur Langsung dan teknik Padan Referensial dengan mengacu pada teori Morfologi Derivasional dan Semantik Derivasional. Hasil analisis terdiri atas dua temuan sebagai berikut. Pertama, karakter morfosemantik afiks {ber-} pada konstruksi VDaj tercipta hanya jika afiks tersebut berdistribusi secara serial bersama salah satu jenis ajektiva bI. Kedua, secara khusus, ditemukan sekurang-kurangnya tiga kecenderungan ciri morfosemantik afiks {ber-}, yaitu (a) menciptakan VDaj bertipe KEADAAN, (b) melekatkan status peran semantis PENGALAM pada argumen penyerta VDaj, dan (d) mewujudkan makna gramatikal VDaj RESIPROKAL secara terbatas.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aikhenvald, A., & Dixon, R. M. W. (2011). Language at Large: Essays on Syntax and Semantics. Brill. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004206076.i-606
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2007). Typological distinctions in word-formation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description (pp. 1–65). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/-CBO9780511618437.001
Alexiadou, A. (2021). Definite Plural Generics in English: Evidence from De-adjectival Nominalization. In Determiners and Quantifiers (pp. 29–54). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004473324_003
Alexiadou, A., & Iordǎchioaia, G. (2014). Two Syntactic Strategies to Derive Deadjectival Nominals. Anglica Wratislaviensia, 52(0), 65–83. https://wuwr.pl/awr/article/view/179
Amiot, D., & Tribout, D. (2018). De-adjectival Human Nouns in French. In G. Booij (Ed.), The Construction of Words: Advances in Construction Morphology (pp. 201–217). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74394-3_8
Anagnostopoulou, E., & Samioti, Y. (2014). Domains within words and their meanings. In The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax (pp. 81–111). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0005
Anderson, S. R. (2015). The Morpheme: Its nature and use. In M. Baerman (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Inflection (pp. 10–34). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591428.013.2
Andreou, M. (2017). The semantics of compounding. Morphology, 27(4), 721–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-017-9311-1
Antoniová, V. (2016). Derivational paradigm – Is there any? A contrastive research . SKASE JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL LINGUISTICS, 13(2), 91–105. http://www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL32/pdf_doc/05.pdf
Antoniová, V., & Štekauer, P. (2015). Derivational paradigms within selected conceptual fields–contrastive research. Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature, 13(2), 61–75. http://casopisi.junis.ni.ac.rs/index.php/FULingLit/article/view/833
Armstrong, G., Cristina, C. M., & Roberge, Y. (2012). On The Adjectival Component Of Change Of State Verbs In Spanish. In M. C. Cuervo & Y. Roberge (Eds.), The End of Argument Structure (pp. 13–41). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1163/9781780523774_003
Ausensi, J. (2021a). Beavers John and Andrew Koontz-Garboden, The Roots of Verbal Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. Pp. xvii + 255. Journal of Linguistics, 57(1), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226720000390
Ausensi, J. (2021b). The semantics of roots determines argument structure. Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung, 25(0), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2021.v25i0.926
Bauer, L. (2019). Rethinking morphology. Edinburgh. Edinburgh University Prrss.
Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2013). The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001
Blevins, J. P. (2016). Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593545.001.0001
Booij, G. (2007a). The Grammar of Words. Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226245.001.0001
Booij, G. (2007b). The word as a linguistic unit. In The Grammar of Words (pp. 281–294). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226245.003.0012
Booij, G. (2010). Construction Morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(7), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00213.x
Booij, G. (2016). Construction Morphology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology (pp. 424–448). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139814720.016
Borer, H. (2013). Structuring Sense: Volume III: Taking Form. Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001
Borzenko, E. (2015). Semantic and pragmatic differences between denominal and deadjectival comparatives with the same root in the contemporary Russian speech (жизнее and жизненнее, травее and травянистее etc.). St.Tikhons’ University Review. Series III. Philology, 43(3), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.15382/sturIII20-1543.32-47
Caballero, G., & Inkelas, S. (2013). Word construction: tracing an optimal path through the lexicon. Morphology, 23(2), 103–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-013-9220-x
Chigusa, M. (2014). The Morphology of Deadjectival Nominals and Verbs in Japanese. JELS : 日本英語学会大会・国際春季フォーラム研究発表論文集 : Papers from the Conference and from the International Spring Forum of the English Linguistic Society of Japan, 31, 70–76. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1520290884702338816.bib?lang=en
Civardi, E., & Bertinetto, P. M. (2015). The semantics of degree verbs and the telicity issue. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 4(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.4.1.3398
Dobrik, Z. (2017). Denominal, deadjectival and deverbal adjectives in Slovak and German. XLinguae, 10(3), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2017.10.03.11
Embick, D. (2015). The Morpheme. DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501502569
Fleischhauer, J., & Gamerschlag, T. (2014). We’re going through changes: How change of state verbs and arguments combine in scale composition. Lingua, 141, 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/-j.lingua.2013.01.006
Francez, I., & Koontz-Garboden, A. (2015). Semantically impossible adjectives. Roots IV.
Haspelmath, M. (2012). How to compare major word-classes across the world’s languages. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, Theories of Everything, 17(16), 109–130.
Haspelmath, M. (2020). The morph as a minimal linguistic form. Morphology, 30(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-020-09355-5
Haspelmath, M., & Sims, A. (2010). Understanding Morphology (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Hathout, N., & Namer, F. (2014a). Démonette, a French derivational morpho-semantic network. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 11, 125–168. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:56317931
Hathout, N., & Namer, F. (2014b). Discrepancy between form and meaning in word-formation: The case of over- and under-marking in French (pp. 177–190). https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.327.12hat
Jackendoff, R. (2009). Meaning and the lexicon: The parallel architecture 1975-2010. Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, R., & Audring, J. (2018). Relational Morphology in the Parallel Architecture. In J. Audring & F. Masini (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory (pp. 389–408). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668984.013.33
Jackendoff, R., & Audring, J. (2019). The Texture of the Lexicon. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198827900.001.0001
Khachatryan, R. (2011). On Semantic and Syntactic Structures of Sentences with Deadjectival Causative Verbs in Modern English. Armenian Folia Anglistika, 7(1 (8)), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.46991/AFA/2011.7.1.063
Koontz-Garboden, A. (2010). The lexical semantics of derived statives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 33(4), 285–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9082-9
Körtvélyessy, L., Bagasheva, A., Štekauer, P., Valera, S., & Genči, J. (2020). Derivational networks in European languages: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Derivational Networks Across Languages (pp. 485–608). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110686630-049
Kotowski, S., & Plag, I. (2023). The Semantics of Derivational Morphology (S. Kotowski & I. Plag, Eds.). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111074917
Lee, C. (2013). Change of Location and Change of State (pp. 291–310). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5189-7_13
Lieber, R. (2001). Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486296
Lieber, R. (2006). Syntax of Words. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (pp. 405–408). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00144-9
Lieber, R. (2007). The category of roots and the roots of categories: what we learn from selection in derivation. Morphology, 16(2), 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-006-9106-2
Lieber, R. (2010). On the lexical semantics of compounds (pp. 127–144). https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.311.11lie
Lieber, R. (2011). A Lexical Semantic Approach to Compounding. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0005
Lieber, R. (2015). The semantics of transposition. Morphology, 25(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-015-9261-4
Lieber, R. (2017). Derivational Morphology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.248
Lieber, R., & Štekauer, P. (2011). Introduction: Status and Definition of Compounding. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0001
Lieber, R., Štekauer, P., & Fábregas, A. (2014). Adjectival and Adverbial Derivation. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641642.013.0016
Luthfiani, E., Wagiran, W., & Rustono, R. (2020). Meaning Patterns and Potential Forms of Halle Deadjektival Verbs Model in Generative Indonesian Morphology. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(1), 45–52.
Martin, F., & Piñón, C. (2020). Verbalizing nouns and adjectives: The case of behavior-related verbs. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.833
Martin, F., & Schaefer, F. (2013). On the Argument Structure of Verbs with Bi-and Mono-Eventive Uses *.
Marušić, B., & Katavić-Čaušić, S. (2018). The Word Class Adjective in English Business Magazines Online. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 6(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2018-0018
Masini, F., & Audring, J. (2018). Construction Morphology. In J. Audring & F. Masini (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory (pp. 364–389). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668984.013.25
Melloni, C. (2014). Andrew Spencer, Lexical relatedness: A paradigm-based model. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. xxii + 451. Journal of Linguistics, 50(3), 761–767. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226714000395
Mugdan, J. (2015). Units of word-formation. In Word-Formation (pp. 235–301). DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-017
Nugraha, D. S. (2020). The Comparative Analysis of Syntactic Features Between Indonesian and English Denominal Verbs. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v15i1.7680
Nugraha, D. S. (2021a). Makna-makna gramatikal konstruksi verba denominatif dalam bahasa Indonesia. Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Pengajarannya, 49(2), 224. https://doi.org/10.17977/um015v49i22021p224
Nugraha, D. S. (2021b). Morphosemantic Features of Derivational Affix {Me(N)-} in The Indonesian Denumeral Verb Constructions.
Sirok Bastra, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.37671/sb.v9i2.317
Oostendorp, M. (2007). Derived Environment Effects and Consistency of Exponence. In Freedom of Analysis? (pp. 123–148). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198591.123
Padó, S., Herbelot, A., Kisselew, M., & Šnajder, J. (2016). Predictability of Distributional Semantics in Derivational Word Formation.
Panagiotidis, E. P. (2011). Categorial features and categorizers. The Linguistic Review, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2011.010
Plag, I., & Baayen, H. (2009). Suffix Ordering and Morphological Processing. Language, 85(1), 109–152. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40492847
Polakof, A. C. (2019). Lo concreto y lo abstracto en nominalizaciones deadjetivales. Revista Signos, 52(100), 410–431. https://doi.org/10.4067/S071809342019000200410
Raffaelli, I. (2013). The model of morphosemantic patterns in the description of lexical architecture. Lingue e linguaggio, Rivista semestrale, 1/2013, 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1418/73676
Rainer, F., Gardani, F., Luschützky, H. C., & Dressler, W. U. (2014). Morphology and Meaning (F. Rainer, F. Gardani, H. C. Luschützky, & W. U. Dressler, Eds.; Vol. 327). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.327
Rice, K. (2011). Principles of affix ordering: An overview. Word Structure, 4(2), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2011.0009
Roßdeutscher, A. (2014). When roots license and when they respect semantico‐syntactic structure in verbs. In The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax (pp. 282–309). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0013
Roy, I. (2010). Deadjectival nominalizations and the structure of the adjective. In The Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks (pp. 129–158). DE GRUYTER MOUTON. https://doi.org/-10.1515/9783110245875.129
Sanacore, D., Hathout, N., & Namer, F. (2021). Frame-like structure for morphosemantic description.
Santosso, J. (2005). Tipe-tipe Leksem Adjektiva pada Verba Deadjektiva Bentuk me(N)-D, me(N)-D-i, dan me(N)-D-kan dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Schulte, M. (2015). Polysemy and synonymy in derivational affixation—a case study of the English suffixes -age and -ery. Morphology, 25(4), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-015-9271-2
Sims, A. D., & Parker, J. (2015). Lexical processing and affix ordering: cross-linguistic predictions. Morphology, 25(2), 143–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-015-9257-0
Sleeman. (2014). Deadjectival human nouns: conversion, nominal ellipsis, or mixed category? https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:220687659
Spencer, A. (2013). Lexical relatedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oxford University Press.
Spyropoulos, V., Revithiadou, A., & Panagiotidis, P. (2015). Verbalizers leave marks: evidence from Greek. Morphology, 25(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1007-/s11525-015-9260-5
Štekauer, P. (2015). The delimitation of derivation and inflection. In Word-Formation (pp. 218–235). DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-016
Stump, G., & Finkel, R. A. (2013). Morphological Typology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/-CBO9781139248860
Stupak, I. (2020). Positional verbs: derivation semantics and functioning. Pragmalinguistica, 28, 128–146. https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2020.i28.07
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis Bahasa [Method and technique of language study]. Sanata Dharma University Press.
Sugioka, Y. (2000). Transitivity Alternations in Deadjectival Verbs.
Tham, S. W. (2013). Change of state verbs and result state adjectives in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Linguistics, 49(3), 647–701. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226713000261
Tovena, L. M., & Colinet, M. (2011). On the arguments of deadjectival verbs and some aspects of their adjectival bases. 275282.
Varvara, R., Lapesa, G., & Padó, S. (2021). Grounding semantic transparency in context. Morphology, 31(4), 409–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-021-09382-w
Villalba, X. (2004). The linguistic bases of the property/quality distinction: Deadjectival nominalizations in Spanish . . . Philosophy, 27, 739-776.
Wälchli, B., & Cysouw, M. (2012). Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics, 50(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0021
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.




.png)
